Prediction of Adam Jones [] vs Fons Van Sambeek [] Head-to-Head At The 1970
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W L L L W W L W L
Form
L W L L W W W L L LHead To Head: Jones 1 - 0 Sambeek
They have played 2 sets in total, with Jones winning 2 and Sambeek winning 0. The last match between Jones and Sambeek was at the M25 Columbus, 13-11-2024, First, I.hard with Adam Jones getting the victory 6-1 6-4.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Adam Jones | 1 |
| Fons Van Sambeek | 0 |
Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-1 6-4 |
Stats 
Adam Jones
Player
Fons Van Sambeek
50%
(
28 of
56)
1st Serve %
70%
(
40 of
57)
4
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
6
93%
(
26 of
28)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
23 of
40)
39%
(
11 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
34%
(
19 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
28 of
57)
65
Total Points Won
48
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 5 |
| 4 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 5 | Total Double Faults | 6 |
| 1:38:0 | Average Match Time | 1:38:0 |
| 50% (28/56) | 1st Serve % | 70% (40/57) |
| 93% (26/28) | 1st Serve Win % | 57% (23/40) |
| 39% (11/28) | 2nd Serve Win % | 35% (6/17) |
| 50% (4/8) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 25% (1/4) |
| 49% (28/57) | Return Points Win % | 34% (19/56) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Adam Jones vs Fons Van Sambeek Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Jones 1 - 0 Sambeek
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Jones has won 41.77% of points on their second serve, while Sambeek has won 35.29%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Jones, in recent form, has won 48.78% of their opponent's second serve points, while Sambeek has won 60.71%. The same stats for first serve returns are 24.2% and 7.14% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Jones has saved 47.25% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Sambeek has saved 50% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Jones has won 50% of matches played (W/L 21/ 21), with Sambeek winning 47.62% (W/L 10/ 11) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Jones has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 53% (W/L 105/ 94), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 3). Sambeek has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 55% (W/L 16/ 13), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 50% (W/L 7/ 7).
- Player level: In the last year, Jones has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 50% of matches (W/L 21/ 21), where as Sambeek has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 47.62% of matches (W/L 10/ 11). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Jones winning 1 times and Sambeek being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Jones winning 2 and Sambeek winning 0. The last match between Jones and Sambeek was at the M25 Columbus, 13-11-2024, First, I.hard with Adam Jones getting the victory 6-1 6-4.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:38:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Jones and Sambeek have played a deciding set 0 times, with Jones winning 0 times and Sambeek 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Jones winning 0, and Sambeek 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Jones has played against opponents with an average rank of 11.95 while Sambeek has played against players with an average rank of 136.43.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Jones has won 50% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Sambeek has won 38% in all matches played on tour.
- Current event H2H stats: Past player performance is very useful in predicting tennis matches, but once an event is under way we should also look at current event stats for in form player indication, so check the section below (if they have played a match in the current event). Some players also perform better at certain events and this should be taken into account when picking the outcome.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Jones has converted 32% of breakpoint opportunities, and Sambeek has converted 25% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
Adam Jones vs Fons Van Sambeek Best Odds For The Match
Adam Jones Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
David Fix
Player
Adam Jones
60%
(
36 of
60)
1st Serve %
70%
(
48 of
69)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
78%
(
28 of
36)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
30 of
48)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
28%
(
17 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
31 of
69)
74
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-3 7-5 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Andy Nguyen
Player
Adam Jones
61%
(
43 of
70)
1st Serve %
77%
(
37 of
48)
5
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
77%
(
33 of
43)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
19 of
37)
37%
(
10 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
6 of
11)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
39%
(
27 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
23 of
48)
66
Total Points Won
52
|
7-6(8) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Adam Jones
Player
Ryan Dickerson
61%
(
52 of
85)
1st Serve %
64%
(
35 of
55)
7
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
4
69%
(
36 of
52)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
22 of
35)
45%
(
15 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
40%
(
34 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
23 of
55)
74
Total Points Won
66
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-4 6-7(4) 10-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-4 7-5 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Cem Ilkel
Player
Adam Jones
61%
(
27 of
44)
1st Serve %
72%
(
34 of
47)
8
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
78%
(
21 of
27)
1st Serve Won
32%
(
11 of
34)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
7 of
13)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
30%
(
13 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
29 of
47)
60
Total Points Won
31
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Adam Jones
Player
Felix Mischker
65%
(
40 of
62)
1st Serve %
58%
(
31 of
53)
3
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
2
65%
(
26 of
40)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
37%
(
23 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
28 of
53)
67
Total Points Won
48
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Yanaki Milev
Player
Adam Jones
51%
(
18 of
35)
1st Serve %
62%
(
28 of
45)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
94%
(
17 of
18)
1st Serve Won
32%
(
9 of
28)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
7 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
56
Total Points Won
24
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Fons Van Sambeek Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Adam Jones
Player
Fons Van Sambeek
50%
(
28 of
56)
1st Serve %
70%
(
40 of
57)
4
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
6
93%
(
26 of
28)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
23 of
40)
39%
(
11 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
34%
(
19 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
28 of
57)
65
Total Points Won
48
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 7-5 3-6 12-10 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Daniel Michalski
Player
Fons Van Sambeek
66%
(
53 of
80)
1st Serve %
61%
(
45 of
74)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
5
75%
(
40 of
53)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
26%
(
7 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
41%
(
33 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
36 of
74)
83
Total Points Won
71
|
2-6 6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Fons Van Sambeek
Player
Neo Niedner
62%
(
62 of
100)
1st Serve %
65%
(
66 of
102)
8
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
4
66%
(
41 of
62)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
40 of
66)
55%
(
21 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
25%
(
4 of
16)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
38%
(
38 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
43 of
102)
105
Total Points Won
97
|
4-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Fons Van Sambeek
Player
Gregor Hausberger
55%
(
37 of
67)
1st Serve %
60%
(
45 of
75)
4
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
62%
(
23 of
37)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
27 of
45)
47%
(
14 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
45%
(
30 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
35 of
75)
72
Total Points Won
71
|
6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-1 3-6 10-7 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Theo Papamalamis
Player
Fons Van Sambeek
55%
(
41 of
74)
1st Serve %
63%
(
50 of
79)
4
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
4
68%
(
28 of
41)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
26 of
50)
42%
(
14 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
43%
(
32 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
39 of
79)
81
Total Points Won
72
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Christian Djonov
Player
Fons Van Sambeek
56%
(
42 of
75)
1st Serve %
62%
(
48 of
78)
4
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
62%
(
26 of
42)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
31 of
48)
61%
(
20 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
9 of
30)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
39%
(
29 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
38 of
78)
84
Total Points Won
69
|
6-2 6-7(4) 10-5 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-3 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Ergi Kirkin
Player
Fons Van Sambeek
55%
(
30 of
55)
1st Serve %
56%
(
36 of
64)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
70%
(
21 of
30)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
22 of
36)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
35%
(
19 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
32 of
64)
68
Total Points Won
51
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Where To Watch Jones vs Sambeek?
When the match starts we will have live scores and stats on this page. For live streaming at TV channels of this match, see our ATP and WTA worldwide viewing pages. Free trial live streaming of Jones Vs Sambeek is now available here.
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 49% (146/151) | Win/Loss | 52% (45/41) |
| 49% (317/332) | Sets Win/Loss | 53% (103/93) |
| 50% (3179/3151) | Games Win/Loss | 51% (978/938) |
| 0.15 | Aces Per Game | 0.11 |
| 449 | Aces Total | 102 |
| 0.14 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.15 |
| 446 | Total Double Faults | 144 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1:6:49 |
| 81.18 | Average Opponent Rank | 104.07 |
| 60% (5247/8679) | 1st Serve % | 64% (2273/3568) |
| 68% (3560/5247) | 1st Serve Win % | 64% (1447/2273) |
| 50% (1701/3431) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (599/1295) |
| 42% (262/621) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 47% (163/349) |
| 36% (3003/8263) | Return Points Win % | 41% (1398/3378) |
| 49% (142/289) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 52% (45/86) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 52% (35/67) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 53% (9/17) |
| 54% (34/63) | Deciding Set Win % | 46% (11/24) |
| 91% (145/132) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 86% (50/43) |
| 9% (145/13) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 14% (50/7) |
| 9% (152/14) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 6% (36/2) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
